Subsector: Land Use
Locate Project Near Bike Path / Bike Lane
VMT Reduction Potential: 1
Cost: 1
ROI: 1
StanCOG Relevancy: 5
Land Use Content: Urban, Suburban
Trip Type: School, Residential, Commute, Recreation
Scale: Community, Site
Timing: Mid-term (3-10 years)
Implementors-Private: Developers (Employment), Developers (Residential)
Implementors-Public: Municipalities, Regional Agencies
References: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (2024), StanCOG Active Transportation Plan, StanCOG 2026 RTP/SCS, Local Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans

Description

Locating developments near bike infrastructure which encourages residents, employees, or visitors to choose biking over private vehicles.

Implementation Details

  • Incentivize project siting within 1/4 mile of a Class I, Class II, or Class IV bike facility.
  • Use StanCOG and local bicycle-network data to identify infill and redevelopment opportunities adjacent to existing or planned bicycle corridors.
  • Encourage coordination between developers and public works departments to fill bikeway network gaps during new construction.

Mitigation Potential

Developments located near bike infrastructure can encourage residents, employees, or visitors to choose biking over private vehicles. The impact of VMT will vary based on the coverage of the bicycle network and the distance to key destinations or high quality transit. While there are no direct quantification tools for estimating the impact there are various GIS accessibility methods and direct demand methods that can be used to quantify this strategy. Most of these methods require detailed count or travel survey data and may not be as efficient as using other linked strategies to quantify potential reductions.

Linked Strategies

Equity Considerations

Locating projects near bike infrastructure in low-income areas helps increase mobility options for residents without cars. Equity considerations should include providing safe and connected bike facilities in areas that historically lacked them, and ensuring maintenance and lighting to support safe travel.

Funding Sources

Development projects can incorporate bicycle connections through private project funding and required frontage or site improvements. Local jurisdictions can also combine bicycle access improvements with Statewide Active Transportation Program, Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning, Safe Routes to School, federal Transportation Alternatives, and other bicycle and pedestrian funding sources. Coordinating bicycle improvements with development projects can reduce the cost of completing network gaps and improve access to existing bicycle facilities.

Examples/Case Studies

Modesto – Crows Landing Road Corridor

The Crows Landing Road Corridor Study identified opportunities to improve bicycle and pedestrian mobility along an economically active corridor where basic infrastructure was lacking. The study specifically evaluated ways to improve multimodal access, safety, and connectivity while supporting infill development.

StanCOG Regional Active Transportation Planning

StanCOG’s Regional Active Transportation Plan coordinates bicycle and pedestrian investments across Stanislaus County and provides a framework for connecting local bicycle facilities between jurisdictions. The regional approach supports locating new development and transportation investments where they can connect to existing active transportation networks.