Subsector: Neighborhood Design
Provide Bike Network / Facility Improvements
VMT Reduction Potential: 4
Cost: 4
ROI: 3
StanCOG Relevancy: 5
Land Use Content: Urban, Suburban, Rural
Trip Type: School, Residential, Commute, Recreation
Scale: Regional, Community
Timing: Mid-term (3-10 years)
Implementors-Private: Developers (Employment), Developers (Residential), Property Managers
Implementors-Public: Municipalities, Regional Agencies
References: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (2024), StanCOG Regional Active Transportation Plan, Caltrans Bikeway Design Manual

Description

Constructing and enhancing bike facilities that provide safe and convenient infrastructure makes cycling a more attractive mode of transportation. Caltrans defines four classes of bicycle facilities: Class I paths are fully separated bikeways, Class II are striped bike lanes on streets, Class III are shared routes with signage, and Class IV are separated bikeways protected by barriers or curbs. Class IV facilities provide the greatest safety benefits because physical separation reduces conflicts with vehicles, lowering the risk of crashes and improving comfort for a wider range of riders. Combining Class IV facilities with lighting can increase the safety and security of the facility.

Implementation Details

  • Implement Class I, II, III, and IV bikeways consistent with the StanCOG Regional Active Transportation Plan and local active transportation plans, with a near-term focus on filling network gaps.
  • Upgrade existing bike lanes with green paint, buffers, and intersection treatments to meet best practices for safety.
  • Prioritize school zones, downtown commercial districts, and transit access points using a low-stress network approach.
  • Coordinate project funding through StanCOG’s regional transportation planning and active transportation programs, local transportation sales tax programs, and Caltrans funding opportunities.

Mitigation Potential

Bicycle infrastructure improvements increase safety, comfort, and convenience of biking, making biking a more attractive alternative to Single Occupancy Vehicles. Impacts on VMT  will vary based on the location and connection of the bicycle networks to local/regional networks and transit stops.

For more details, see the resources listed below for VMT reduction quantification:

Linked Strategies

Equity Considerations

Expanding the bikeway network offers low-cost mobility options to residents who cannot afford a car. Prioritize bikeway expansion in historically disinvested neighborhoods and ensure facilities connect to jobs, transit, and schools. Include engagement with communities of color and youth to co-design safe and accessible routes.

Funding Sources

Likely requires significant initial funding to construct, plus continued funding for maintenance and operations. Developers can contribute to network expansion or improvements where there is an appropriate nexus. Funding sources include the Statewide Active Transportation Program, Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants, Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funding, and Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program.

Examples/Case Studies

StanCOG Regional Active Transportation Plan

StanCOG’s countywide Regional Active Transportation Plan identifies a regional bicycle and pedestrian network, priority routes, existing barriers, and opportunities for improving connections throughout Stanislaus County. The plan provides a regional framework for prioritizing bicycle facility investments and coordinating projects between jurisdictions.

City of Modesto Non-Motorized Transportation Plan

Modesto’s 2023 Non-Motorized Transportation Plan provides recommendations for expanding the city’s bicycle and pedestrian networks, including more than 192 miles of recommended bicycle facilities. The plan emphasizes creating a connected, accessible, safe, and comfortable network for residents of all ages and abilities.